Comparison of a polymeric pseudostationary phase in EKC with ODS stationary phase in RP‐HPLC

Skip to Navigation

EarlyView Article

  • Published: Oct 17, 2017
  • Author: Xinjiong Ni, Min Zhang, Xiaoping Xing, Yuhua Cao, Guangqun Cao


Poly(stearyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) (P(SMA‐co‐MAA)) was induced as pseudostationary phase (PSP) in electrokinetic chromatography (EKC). The n‐octadecyl groups in SMA were the same as that in octadecylsilane (ODS) C18 column. Thus, the present work focused on the comparison of selectivity between polymeric PSP and ODS stationary phase (SP), and the effect of organic modifiers on the selectivity of polymeric PSP and ODS SP. 1‐butanol could directly interacted with PSP as a Class I modifier, and improved both of the methylene selectivity and polar group selectivity. When the analysis times were similar, the polymeric PSP exhibited better methylene selectivity and polar group selectivity. Although the hydrophobic groups were similar, the substituted benzenes elution order was different between polymeric PSP and ODS SP. Linear solvation energy relationships (LSER) model analysis found that polymeric PSP and ODS SP exhibited two same key factors in selectivity: hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding acidity. But polymeric PSP exhibited relatively strong n‐ and π‐electrons interaction to the analytes.

Social Links

Share This Links

Bookmark and Share


Suppliers Selection
Societies Selection

Banner Ad

Click here to see
all job opportunities

Most Viewed

Copyright Information

Interested in spectroscopy? Visit our sister site

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved